Gambling subculture in the Turkish Cypriot community

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.835376

Keywords:

Gambling addiction, subculture, casino, TRNC

Abstract

Objective: Many studies reveal the prevalence of gambling addiction among Cypriots. The prevalence of gambling behavior (PPK) in the Turkish Cypriot community stands out as one of the four societies with the highest gambling addiction in the world with the “extremely high” classification. This study aims the historical dimension of the gambling culture in the Turkish Cypriot community and how gambling addiction has been shaped as a subculture in casinos are analyzed.
Method: Semi structured interviews were conducted with 20 gamblers and one casino manager living in Cyprus. Qualitative research method was used.
Results: The meaning of gambling for gamblers, casino routines (how often they go to the casino, who they go with, what types of gambling they play, their superstitions in gambling) and gamblers’ dreams have been obtained. Conclusion: Contrary to popular belief, the meaning of gambling for gamblers is primarly “pleasure and relaxation. The desire to make Money is seen as the second or third goal. Gambling behavior in the Turkish Cypriot community has gone beyond being an activity aimed at socializing and having fun. It has reached the advanced stages of gambling addiction. The political, social and economic structure of TRNC is the most important factor.

References

Dinç M. Eylemsel bir bağımlılık: Kumar. Yesilay Dergisi 2014; 967: 20-23.

Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144(9): 1184-1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184

Nower L, Blaszczynski A. Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. J Gambl Stud 2010; 26(3): 361-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9170-8

Clark L. Disordered gambling: the evolving concept of behavioral addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014; 1327(1): 46-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12558

Çakıcı M, Çakıcı E, Karaaziz M, et al. KKTC'de kumar yaygınlığı, risk etkenleri ve kültür tutumları ile ilişkisi: 2007-2014. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2019; 20(4): 395-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.64774

Murray GF. The cannabis-cocaine connection: A comparative study of use and users. J Drug Issues 1984; 14(4): 665-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204268401400406

Smart RG, Ogborne AC. Drug use and drinking among students in 36 countries. Addict Behav 2000; 25(3): 455-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(99)00013-1

Pedersen W. Cannabis use: Subcultural opposition or social marginality? A population-based longitudinal study. Acta Sociol 2009; 52(2): 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309104001

Mjaland K. A culture of sharing: Drug exchange in a Norwegian prison. Punishm Soc 2014; 16(3): 336-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514527149

Vondrackova P, Gabrhelik R. Prevention of internet addiction: A systematic review. J Behav Addict 2016; 5(4): 568-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.085

Zajac K, Ginley MK, Chang R, et al. Treatments for internet gaming disorder and Internet addiction: A systematic review. Psychol Addict Behav 2017; 31(8): 979-994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000315

Neverkovich SD, Bubnova IS, Kosarenko NN, et al. Students’ internet addiction: Study and prevention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018; 14(4): 1483-1495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83723

Devereux EC. Gambling and the Social Structure: A Sociological Study of Lotteries and Horse Racing in Contemporary America. London: Ayer Co Press, 1980.

Lesieur HR. The Chase: Career of the Compulsive Gambler. Massachussets, MA: Anchor Press, 1977.

Livingston J. Compulsive Gamblers: Observations on Action and Abstinence. New York: Harper Row Press, 1974.

Preston FW, Shapiro PD, Keene JR. Successful aging and gambling: Predictors of gambling risk among older adults in Las Vegas. Am Behav Sci 2007; 51(1): 102-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207304850

Kalischuk RG. Cocreating life pathways: Problem gambling and its impact on families. Fam J Alex Va 2010; 18(1): 7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480709357898

Binde P. Preventing and responding to gambling-related harm and crime in the workplace. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2016; 33(3): 247-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2016-0020

Salonen AH, Hellman M, Latvala T, et al. Gambling participation, gambling habits, gambling-related harm, and opinions on gambling advertising in Finland in 2016. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2018; 35(3): 215234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518765875

Sağır A, Çabuk S. Şans oyunlarının toplumun beklentileri üzerine etkisi: Sakarya örneği. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Dergisi 2010; 12(1): 143-166.

Üstün A. At yarışı oynayanların sosyalleşme deneyimleri. V. Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmaları Kongresi - Bildiriler Kitabı I. 2016.

Berg BL, Lune H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi, 2019.

Hebdige D, Tarım E. Gençlik ve Altkültürleri. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınevi, 1988.

Griffiths MD. The cognitive psychology of gambling. J Gambl Stud. 1990; 6(1): 31-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015747

Reith G. The Age of Chance: Gambling in Western culture. London: Psychology Press, 2002.

Dostoyevsky F. The Gambler. London: Hesperus Press, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Macit, R. (2021). Gambling subculture in the Turkish Cypriot community. Journal of Dependence, 22(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.835376