Examining the meaning of space as a relational actor in drug use experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1511081Keywords:
Space, drug addiction, relationalityAbstract
Objective: This research aims to understand how and why places become meaningful for individuals in substance use experiences.
Method: Within the scope of this study, which was designed with a phenomenological qualitative design, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 participants who were being treated in Manisa Decontamination Centre due to substance use experience, and the information obtained was analysed within the framework of relational space understanding with content analysis technique.
Results: The findings reveal the existence of certain dynamics that make spaces conducive or unfavorable for substance use. While elements of insecurity, secrecy, belonging and pressure are prominent in spaces conducive to use, spatial dynamics related to substance withdrawal are associated with horizontal relations, flexible rules, shared experiences and routine-building practices in treatment spaces.
Conclusion: The research has the potential to contribute to social policies in the fight against substance abuse by providing in-depth information on preferences, interactions, boundaries and actions related to substance use.
References
Matto HC, Cleaveland CL. A social-spatial lens to examine poverty, violence, and addiction. J Soc Work Pract Addict 2016; 16(1-2): 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2016.1165113
Rogowski S. Social work with children and families: challenges and possibilities in the neo-liberal world. Br J Soc Work 2012; 42(5): 921-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr129
Löw M. The constitution of space: The structuration of spaces through the simultaneity of effect and perception. Eur J Soc Theory 2008; 11(1): 25-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286
Brotherhood A. Interpreted space’as a mediator between physical environment and situated substance use: outline of a socio-spatial theory for substance use prevention. Drugs (Abingdon Engl) 2023; 30(1): 42-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2022.2061918
Cooper H. Medical theories of opiate addiction's aetiology and their relationship to addicts’ perceived social position in the United States an historical analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2004; 15(5): 435-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.05.006
Moore D, Dietze P. Enabling environments and the reduction of drug-related harm: re-framing Australian policy and practice. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24(3): 275-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230500170258
Dilkes-Frayne E, Duff C. Tendencies and trajectories: the production of subjectivity in an event of drug consumption. Environ Plan D 2017; 35(5): 951-967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817705660
Cooper HLF, Tempalski B. Integrating place into research on drug use, drug users’ health, and drug policy. Int J Drug Policy 2014; 25(3): 503-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.004
Gomart E. Surprised by methadone: in praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body Soc 2004; 10(2-3): 85-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042937
Duff C. Towards a theory of drug use contexts: space, embodiment and practice. Addict Res Theory 2007; 15(5): 503-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350601165448
Jayne M, Valentine G, Holloway SL. Emotional, embodied and affective geographies of alcohol, drinking and drunkenness. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2010; 35(4): 540-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00401.x
Rhodes T. Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy 2009; 20(3): 193-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003
Böhling F. Crowded contexts: on the affective dynamics of alcohol and other drug use in nightlife spaces. Contemp Drug Probl 2014; 41(3): 361-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091404100305
Decorte T. Drug users’ perceptions of ‘controlled’and ‘uncontrolled’use. Int J Drug Policy 2001; 12(4): 297-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00095-0
Duff C. Drug use as a ‘practice of the self’: Is there any place for an ‘ethics of moderation’in contemporary drug policy? Int J Drug Policy 2004; 15(5-6): 385-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.06.010
Thrift N. Spatial Formations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222362
Thrift N. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London, UK: Routledge, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946565
Fuller MG, Löw M. Introduction: An invitation to spatial sociology. Curr Sociol 2017; 65(4): 469-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697461
Katz J. Start here: social ontology and research strategy. Theor Criminol 2002; 6(3): 255-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136248060200600302
Durkheim E, Swain J. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: A Study in Religious Sociology. New York: Macmillan, 1926.
Harvey D. Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Newyork: Verso, 2006.
Massey D. For Space. Thousand Okas, CA: Sage, 2005.
Lefebvre H. Gündelik Hayatın Eleştirisi II, Ergüden I (Çeviren). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık, 2019.
Simmel G, David F, Featherstone M. Simmel On Culture: Selected Writings. London: Sage, 1997.
Lefebvre H. Mekanın Üretimi, Ergüden I (Çeviren). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık, 2020.
Smith C. Addiction, Modernity and the City: A Users’ Guide to Urban Space. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
Soja E. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. New York: Verso, 1989.
Löw M. The Sociology of Space: Materiality, Social Structures and Action. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-69568-3
Low S. Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. London, UK: Routledge, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671277
Dilkes-Frayne E. Tracing the event of drug use: Context and the coproduction of a night out on MDMA. Contemp Drug Probl 2014; 41(3): 445-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091404100308
Merleau Ponty, M. Algının Fenomenolojisi, Sarıkartal E, Hacımuratoğlu E (Çevirenler). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları, 2017.
Bourdieu P. Ayrım: Beğeni Yargısının Toplumsal Eleştirisi, Fırat D, Berkkurt G (Çevirenler). Ankara: Nika Yayınları, 2021.
Shields R. Spatial Questions: Cultural Topologies And Social Spatialisation. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270028
Foucault M. Güvenlik Toprak Nüfus, Taylan F (Çeviren). 3. Baskı. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2019.
Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford Universıty Press, 2007.
Deleuze G, Guattari F. A Thousand Plateus Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Massumi B (Çeviren). London: Minnesota Press, 1987.
Shudak NJ. Phenomenology. Frey BB, (editor). Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018: 1247-1249.
Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 11. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2018.
Osborne T, Rose N. Spatial phenomenotechnics: making space with Charles Booth and Patrick Geddes. Environ Plan D 2004; 22(2): 209-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d325t
Neuman WL. Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri, Özge S, (Çeviren) İstanbul: Yayınodası Yayıncılık, 2011.
Patton M. Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri, Bütün M, Demir S (Çevirenler). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2018.
Duff C. Enabling places and enabling resources: New directions for harm reduction research and practice. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010; 29(3): 337-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00187.x
Simpson M. The relationship between drug use and crime: a puzzle inside an enigma. Int J Drug Policy 2003; 14(4): 307-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(03)00081-1
Soja E. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996.
Soja E. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Cambridge: Blackwell, 2002
Ford JM, Beveridge AA. Varieties of substance use and visible drug problems: ındividual and neighborhood factors. J Drug Issues 2006; 36(2): 377-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260603600207
Jacopson JO. Do drug treatment facilities increase clients’ exposure to potential neighborhood-level triggers for relapse? A small-area assessment of a large, public treatment system. J Urban Health 2006; 83(1): 150-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-005-9013-6
Harrell A, Peterson GE. Drugs, Crime, and Social Isolation: Barriers to Urban Opportunity. Washington: The Urban Insitute Press, 1992.
Pearson G, Gilman M. Drug epidemics in space and time: local diversity subcultures and social exclusion. Strang J, Gossop M (editors.) Heroin Addiction and the British System. London, UK: Routledge, 2005: 115-134
Wacquant L. Kent Paryaları: İleri Marjinalliğin Karşılaştırmalı Sosyolojisi, Doğan M (Çeviren). 2. Baskı, İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi, 2015.
Pedersen W, Bakken A. Urban landscapes of adolescent substance use. Acta Sociol 2016; 59(2): 131-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699315625448
Draus PL, Roddy, JK, Greenwald M. A hell of a life: addiction and marginality in post-industrial Detroit. Soc Cult Geogr 2010; 11(7): 663-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.508564
Kugu N, Akyüz G, Ersan E, Doğan O. Sanayi bölgesinde çalışan çıraklarda madde kullanımı ve etkileyen etkenlerin araştırılması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2000; 1(1): 19-25.
Ögel K, Tamar D, Evren C, Çakmak D. Uçucu madde kullanımının yaygınlığı: çok merkezli bir araştırmanın verilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2000; 1(4): 220-224.
Fraser S. The chronotope of the queue: Methadone maintenance treatment and the production of time, space and subjects. Int J Drug Policy 2006; 17(3): 192-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.02.010
Goffman E. Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu, Cezar B (Çeviren). 4. Baskı, İstanbul: Metis, 2021.
Goffman E. Damga: Örselenmiş Kimliğin İdare Edilişi Üzerine Notlar, Geniş Ş, Ünsaldı L, Ağırnaslı S (Çevirenler). 4. Baskı, Ankara: Heretik, 2019.
Becker H. Hariciler (Outsiders): Bir Sapkınlık Sosyolojisi Çalışması, Geniş Ş, Ünsaldı L (Çevirenler). 5. Baskı, Ankara: Heretik, 2021.
Rhodes T, Lilly R, Fernández C, et.al. Risk factors associated with drug use: the importance of ‘risk environment’. Drugs (Abingdon Engl) 2003; 10(4): 303-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968763031000077733
Lopez V, Jurik N, Gilliard-Matthews S. Gender sexuality power and drug acquisition strategies among adolescent girls who use meth. Fem Criminol 2009; 4(3): 226-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085109332455
Sallmann J. Going hand-in-hand: connections between women's prostitution and substance use. J Soc Work Pract Addict 2010; 10(2): 115-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332561003730155
Tuchman E. Women and addiction: the importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. J Addict Dis 2010; 29(2): 127-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10550881003684582
Theall KP, Sterk CE, Elifson KW. Perceived neighborhood fear and drug use among young adults. Am J Health Behav 2009; 33(4): 353-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.33.4.2
Ayres T. Substance use in the night-time economy: deviant leisure? Raymen T, Smith O (editors). Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019: 135-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_7
Pennay A, Jenkinson R, Quinn B, et.al. Investigating differences between drugs used in the Australian night-time economy: demographics, substance use, and harm. Subst Use Misuse 2017; 52(1): 71-81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1214153
Dovey K, Fitzgerald J, Choi Y. Safety becomes danger: dilemmas of drug-use in public space. Health Place 2001; 7(4), 319-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00024-7
Butler J. İktidarın Psişik Yaşamı: Tabiyet Üzerine Teoriler, Tütüncü F (Çeviren). 2. Baskı, İstanbul: Ayrıntı, 2015: 107-132.
Hitzler R. The pursuit of “ecstasy” at techno-events. J Drug Issues 2002; 32(2): 459-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260203200208
Kavanaugh PR, Anderson TL. Solidarity and drug use in the electronic dance music scene. Sociol Q 2008; 49(1): 181-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00111.x
Maffesoli M. The Shadow of Dionysus: A Contribution to the Sociology of the Orgy. New York: Suny Press, 1993.
Canetti E. Kitle ve İktidar, Aygen G (Çeviren). 3. Baskı, İstanbul: Ayrıntı, 2006.
Malbon B. Clubbing: Dancing, Ecstasy, Vitality. London, UK: Routledge, 1999.
Malbon B. The dancer from the dance: the musical and dancing crowds of clubbing. Butler M (editor). Electronica, Dance and Club Music. 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge, 2016: 487-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094588-28
Tutenges S. Stirring up effervescence: an ethnographic study of youth at a nightlife resort. Leis Stud 2013; 32(3): 233-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.627372
Tan QH. Flirtatious geographies: clubs as spaces for the performance of affective heterosexualities. Gend Place Cult 2013; 20(6): 718-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2012.716403
Fitzgerald J. Framing Drug Use: Bodies, Space, Economy and Crime. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482242
Brenner N, Elden S. Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory. Int Polit Sociol 2009; 3(4): 353-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00081.x
Kolind T, Duke K. Drugs in prisons: Exploring use, control, treatment and policy. Drugs (Abingdon Engl) 2016; 23(2): 89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2016.1153604
Vest BM, Brady LA, Brimmer MJ, et. al. Variations in risk and motivations for substance use over the course of military service. Subst Use Misuse 2021; 56 (4): 559-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2021.1887257
Bullock T. Changing levels of drug use before, during and after imprisonment. Ramsay M (editor). Prisoners Drug Use And Treatment: Seven Research Studies. London, UK: Home Office Research Study, 2003: 23-48.
Mjåland K. A culture of sharing: drug exchange in a Norwegian prison. Punishm Soc 2014; 16(3): 336-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514527149
Goffman E. Characteristic of total instutions. In Symposium on Preventive and Social Psychiatry. WashingtonDC, 1957: 43-93.
Gojani D, Ahmeti P. Designing of center for treatment and rehabilitation from drug and alcohol addiction. University for Business and Technology International Conference, 2020: 336.
Kanu BC. Integration of Biophilic Design Principles in Drug Rehabilitation Centres Kano Nigeria. Master Thesis. Kano: Federal University of Tecnology, Department of Architecture, 2021.
Evered KT, Evered EÖ. “Not just eliminating the mosquito but draining the swamp” critical geopolitics of Turkish Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Turkey's approach to illicit drugs. Int J Drug Policy 2016; 33: 6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Dependence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal and content of this website is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit unmodified article, and make noncommercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
